<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
 <title>Regulatory Law</title>
 <description>The latest updates from regulatorylaw.co.uk, a free resource for practitioners representing clients before disciplinary tribunals</description>
 <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk</link>
 <ttl>60</ttl>
 <atom:link href="http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

    <item>
        <title>Delay</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Delay.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Delay.html#2008-07-22T14:46:13.194Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:46:13 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>In the case of Spiers v Ruddy (Scotland) [2007] UKPC D2 the House of Lords held that there is nothing in Article 6 of the ECHR to prevent a continuation of delayed proceedings, even if they have not b...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>GMC sanctions</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/GMC_sanctions.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/GMC_sanctions.html#2008-07-14T09:44:58.146Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:44:58 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The approach of the High Court to reviewing sanctions imposed by the Fitness to Practice Panel of the GMC were summarized by Laws LJ (with whom Chadwick LJ and Sir Peter Gibson agreed), in the case of...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Sanctions for solicitors</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Sanctions_for_solicitors.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Sanctions_for_solicitors.html#2008-07-12T07:24:01.420Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:24:01 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Guidance on the imposition of sanctions on solicitors was recently given by the High Court. -- ‘In Nahal v The Law Society [2003] EWHC 2186 Admin, Dyson LJ considered the effect of the Human Rights ...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Judicial review</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Judicial_review.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Judicial_review.html#2008-07-12T07:20:03.921Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:20:03 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>‘Once upon a time the question was posed in terms of an asserted dichotomy between provisions compliance with which is mandatory and provisions that are merely directory. That is no longer treated a...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Chapter 4: Serious professional misconduct</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Chapter_4%3A_Serious_professional_misconduct.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Chapter_4%3A_Serious_professional_misconduct.html#2008-07-11T16:44:57.434Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:44:57 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Important guidance on the standards expected of expert witnesses was given by the Court of Appeal in General Medical Council v Meadow [2006] EWCA Civ 1390. -- Prof. Meadows, who lacked a sufficient st...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>The impartiality of a judge</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/The_impartiality_of_a_judge.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/The_impartiality_of_a_judge.html#2008-07-11T09:17:26.725Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:17:26 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The existence of impartiality (of a judge) for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 must be determined according to a subjective test, that is on the basis of the personal conviction of a particular judge i...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Freedom of Information and data protection</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Freedom_of_Information_and_data_protection.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Freedom_of_Information_and_data_protection.html#2008-07-10T07:37:23.798Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:37:23 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Advice on the interaction of the Freedom of Information and the Data Protection laws was given in the House of Lords in a Scottish context. It was said that, -- ‘There is much force in Lord Marnoch'...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Costs on suspension</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Costs_on_suspension.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Costs_on_suspension.html#2008-07-09T09:18:19.093Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:18:19 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>There could be no general rule that the tribunal should not impose an order for costs in addition to an order for the suspension of a solicitor. Whether or not an order for costs, in addition to a sus...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Chapter 9: The role of the legal assessor</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Chapter_9%3A_The_role_of_the_legal_assessor.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Chapter_9%3A_The_role_of_the_legal_assessor.html#2008-07-09T08:59:55.222Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:59:55 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>It has been said that ‘it is well-established that the role of a legal assessor assisting a disciplinary panel is not analogous to that of a judge summing up in a criminal trial. In R (Campbell) v. ...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Legal assessors</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Legal_assessors.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Legal_assessors.html#2008-07-09T08:58:02.471Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>In R (Campbell) v GMC [2005] EWCA Civ. 250 the Court of Appeal affirmed Lord Hailsham's propositions in Libman v GMC [1972] AC 217 as governing the approach that any court should adopt to the role of ...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Fresh evidence</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Fresh_evidence.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Fresh_evidence.html#2008-07-07T17:17:30.496Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:17:30 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The Privy Council rarely if ever had witnesses give evidence before it in appeals from decisions of the GMC. There is no reason to believe that when Parliament provided that such appeals should come t...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Arbitration and human rights</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Arbitration_and_human_rights.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Arbitration_and_human_rights.html#2008-07-07T17:16:22.770Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:16:22 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Where parties have voluntarily or (as some of the cases put it) freely entered into an arbitration agreement they are to be treated as waiving at least some of their rights to a fair trial under artic...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Freedom of expression</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Freedom_of_expression.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Freedom_of_expression.html#2008-07-06T09:26:31.461Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 09:26:31 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The scope of the right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention were comprehensively reviewed by the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Kulis v Poland - 15601/02...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>index</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/index.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/index.html#2008-07-05T14:10:53.950Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:10:53 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>About this site -- This site is a free resource for practitioners representing clients -- before disciplinary tribunals and for lawyers practising or advising -- in any regulatory area. -- It is based...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Standard of Proof</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Standard_of_Proof.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Standard_of_Proof.html#2008-07-05T14:08:05.102Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:08:05 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>A recent opinion of the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords has gone a long way to clarifying the standard of proof in certain civil proceedings. Lord Hoffmann’s opinion, from which the extrac...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Double jeopardy</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Double_jeopardy.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Double_jeopardy.html#2008-07-05T14:06:42.554Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:06:42 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The absence of any common law double jeopardy rule in professional misconduct proceedings was specifically noted in the case of R v Statutory Committee of the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain [...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Bar Standards Board</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Bar_Standards_Board.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Bar_Standards_Board.html#2008-06-19T07:56:38.074Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:56:38 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Bar Standards Board - the future of the Bar's complaints and disciplinary processes -- The Bar Standards Board was established in January 2006 as a result of the Bar Council separating its regulatory ...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>AADB</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/AADB.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/AADB.html#2008-06-16T16:09:56.308Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:09:56 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Accountancy &amp; Actuarial Discipline Board: Efficient and effective changes to Disciplinary arrangements -- The Accountancy &amp; Actuarial Discipline Board (&quot;AADB&quot;) is the independent, investigative and di...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Costs in disciplinary proceedings</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Costs_in_disciplinary_proceedings.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Costs_in_disciplinary_proceedings.html#2008-06-05T08:06:18.689Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:06:18 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The proper approach to the award of costs for proceedings before the Disciplinary Committee of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and other professional bodies was summarised by the Judicial Com...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Chapter 4: By what professional standard is bad work to be judged?</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Chapter_4%3A_By_what_professional_standard_is_bad_work_to_be_judged%3F.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Chapter_4%3A_By_what_professional_standard_is_bad_work_to_be_judged%3F.html#2008-06-05T07:49:32.900Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 07:49:32 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>It has been held that the standard to be expected of a doctor is ‘that applicable to the post to which he was appointed and the work he was carrying out.’ Holton v General Medical Council [2006] E...</description>
    </item>

</channel>
</rss>
<!-- generated on demand in 0.139 seconds: hostname is 'regulatorylaw.co.uk' -->
